By Kim Moutsos published December 1, 2017

Publishing Frequency: Why (and How) We’re Changing Things Up

cmi-publishing-frequency

How often do you read the weekend posts on Content Marketing Institute the day they’re published? We can tell from traffic the answer is “sometimes” for many of you.

Before I joined the CMI editorial team in September, the same was true for me. The daily alert went to my work inbox, which I monitored on the weekend only for urgent communications. Most of the time, as valuable as the CMI articles are, they didn’t qualify as urgent.

Instead, like many of you, I reviewed them when my attention shifted back to work.

So, it should come as good news that starting this month we’ll help free up your inbox on the weekends.

Our new publishing frequency

Instead of posting to the blog every day of the week, we’re moving to a Monday through Friday schedule. Our daily alerts will continue to land in subscribers’ inboxes every weekday morning, but we’ll leave space on the weekends for you to pause and reflect.

.@CMIContent blog will leave time for readers to pause and reflect on weekends, says @Kmoutsos. Click To Tweet

Some of you might be wondering about two weekend stalwarts – the PNR: This Old Marketing podcast and the Content Strategy for Marketers newsletter.

Following the send-off episode on Dec. 11, PNR goes on hiatus. If you read A Content Marketing Love Letter, you know that CMI founder and PNR co-host Joe Pulizzi is setting off for some well-earned family time in early 2018 and “non-marketing writing projects (and other shenanigans)” thereafter.

If you subscribe to the Content Strategy for Marketing newsletter, you should have received the revamped version in your inbox today. You still got an exclusive column from Chief Strategy Advisor Robert Rose and a link to our latest content strategy article. Now, you’ll also get a digest of the other content published that week.

Doing as we say, now as we do

For years, Joe has encouraged companies to get strategic about their publishing frequency decisions.

Be strategic about the frequency of publishing your content, says @JoePulizzi. Click To Tweet

Attendees of Content Marketing World 2017 heard Jay Baer explain “how to get promoted by creating less content, not more.”  (You can read about strategic changes made subsequently to the publishing schedule at Jay’s company, Convince and Convert.)

And just a few weeks ago, in PNR Episode 207, Joe and Robert talked about the latest research from Orbit Media, which shows a decline in publishing frequency (and an increase in post length) among individual bloggers.

blogging-frequency-over-time

In the podcast, Joe points out that companies like About.com are getting great results by pulling away from publishing more and more answers (recipes for apple pie, for example). Instead, they’re curating lists of their best answers. That makes life easier for visitors. It’s easy to update and avoids the challenge of having your new content competing with your old content (a problem CMI has definitely experienced).

We’re starting to see this trend in our own research, too. CMI’s 2018 study of B2B organizations found that almost half of B2B content marketers are creating less content than they did a year ago and driving better results from it.

Almost 1/2 of B2B marketers are creating less content than 1 year ago & driving better results. @cmicontent Click To Tweet

2018-b2b-research-opinion

You may be wrestling with similar questions – how much content should you produce?

Here’s how we’re approaching this latest experiment of forgoing new content on weekends.

CMI Editorial Strategy Advisor Michele Linn led the charge in asking questions about our publishing frequency – the same questions all content marketers should think about:

  • Are we publishing the right amount for our audience? Or are we just adding to the noise of their daily schedule?
  • Are we publishing the right amount for our team or are we stretching our resources too thin?
  • Are we getting the most impact from everything we produce?

Michele got the ball rolling by sharing lessons learned from earlier experiments and insights from key statistics with Joe and Robert, of course, but also with our editorial, website, marketing, sales, SEO, and social teams.

We carefully considered these factors:

  • Daily publishing’s effect on overall site traffic
    Organic search delivers the highest percentage of visitors on any given day. New posts account for a much smaller percentage of traffic overall. Since traffic dips dramatically on the weekend, we’re not anticipating too much of a traffic hit. Our search-optimized catalog still exists to answer questions no matter when someone is searching. And the extra time in our schedules will help us further optimize our best articles to make sure people can find them through search.
  • Days attracting most email signups
    We didn’t want to jeopardize the growth of our subscriber list, so we checked those numbers carefully. Again, weekends proved to be the lightest days for conversions. And, again, the door to becoming a subscriber is always open, whether we’ve published a fresh post that day or not. There just might be fewer people approaching the door on the weekends.
  • Gut check by team
    Although we did check the data before making this decision, there’s an element of going with our gut too. We work Monday through Friday (most of the time) just as most of you do, so the need for time to pause and reflect resonates. And we think, regardless of the effect on our traffic, most of our audience will appreciate the pause too. (Depending how this experiment turns out, we’ll thank or blame Jay Acunzo for encouraging us to trust our intuition in his inspiring keynote presentation at Content Marketing World 2017.)

What we’ll be watching

Making the change to publishing original content only Monday through Friday isn’t the end of the decision. We’ll keep an eye on email opens, click-through rates, and unsubscribes. We’ll also monitor site traffic and conversions along with search rankings and traffic volume from organic.

.@CMIContent will evaluate metrics and impact of not publishing on weekends, says @Kmoutsos. Click To Tweet

Our plan is to devote the extra hours in our week to optimizing and curating our existing posts on evergreen topics while continuing to spot trends and find the best advice on emerging topics that advance the practice of content marketing.

And, of course, we’ll be listening to your comments and feedback. Let us know what you think – and what you might do with the gift of a few more uninterrupted moments in your weekends.

Want to receive the Monday through Friday email or the weekly digest? Subscribe today.

Cover image by Joseph Kalinowski/Content Marketing Institute

Author: Kim Moutsos

Kim Moutsos is thrilled to join the talented team at the Content Marketing Institute as vice president of editorial. After working in content marketing for enterprises and startups for more than 20 years, she’s looking forward to exchanging ideas and lessons learned with other content marketing practitioners. You can follow her on Twitter at @KMoutsos or connect on LinkedIn.

Other posts by Kim Moutsos

Join Over 200,000 of your Peers!

Get daily articles and news delivered to your email inbox and get CMI’s exclusive e-book Get Inspired: 75 (More) Content Marketing Examples FREE!

  • mwbyrd

    So less is more?

    • Kim Moutsos

      Hi mwbyrd,

      It can be! More also can be more. It comes down to strategy and execution, of course.

      Thanks for reading and commenting.

      Kim

  • Angie Jackson

    Thanks for such a thorough explanation of the changes under way (and the content marketing lessons that came with it). Transparency is a good thing! (Another CM lesson. …)

    I’ve always wondered how CMI could maintain what seemed like a grueling content production schedule. I rationalized that you are THE CONTENT MARKETING INSTITUTE, so you had to lead the pack in this regard. I think you’ve set a better example now by making quality the priority over quantity (and as a bonus, reminded those who need reminding that producing excellent content is NOT as easy as it might look).

    There’s one flaw in your analysis (I think), something I hear a lot — that is, if most traffic comes from search and goes to old content, then it shouldn’t hurt much to cut back on the new. But didn’t all that old content start out as new content? If the pool of searchable content gets proportionately smaller over time, won’t traffic (and therefore conversions) fall off over time as well? I hope you’ll keep us apprised of how this plays out.

    I will really, really miss the regular contributions of Joe Puluzzi. Best wishes to you all, and keep up the excellent work.

    • Kim Moutsos

      Hi Angie,

      We’ll certainly be watching the effect on our search traffic and conversions over time. Keep in mind, of course, that not every piece we publish performs equally in attracting search traffic or conversions. Our plan is to devote some of the resources we’ll reclaim to analyzing and optimizing the existing content that performs and applying those lessons to new content.

      Can we get the same or better results by publishing less? We will find out and certainly report back on what we learn. Stay tuned!

      Thanks for your thoughtful comment.

      Kim

  • Matt

    Hi Kim – thanks for the great article! I have a question though. You say that 1/2 of B2B marketers are creating less content but getting better results. The data published says that 17% agree with that statement, and 51% disagree, with 32% “neither agree nor disagree.” To get to that 50%, I assume you including that 32% in your assertion? If that’s the case, can you elaborate on your rationale to include?

    Thanks!

  • mehedi hasan

    nice