I’m a lucky content creator.
Why? Well, for many reasons. One of the biggest involves working as part of a remarkable strategic content team that includes talented editors (content creators themselves) who improve the structure, clarity, and (on more than one occasion) my poetic words.
Most importantly, they push on my ideas.
They ask questions that challenge me to strengthen my argument. Frequently, they’ve saved me by pushing back on an idea to where I say, “Yeah, you’re right. That’s kind of dopey.”
The current generation of generative AI tools could never do that, and that’s already creating a new set of problems for content generation in marketing.
Meet the new boss; same as the old boss
I’ve talked to more than two dozen software companies for a research project and discussed with several clients the status of the integration of generative AI into their content strategy. Through that work, I’ve identified two distinct AI categories for marketers (and they may sound familiar to regular readers of my column.)
One category involves companies with a strategic content approach. They explore how to pull AI tools into the content creation lifecycle and seek to identify how AI can augment the existing ideation and planning process. These companies use AI frequently, but they rarely, if ever, use it to “create original content.”
The second category encompasses companies without a strategic content approach. They jump in to see how AI can increase the output of their content widgets. These are the same companies that view their content teams as vending machines of digital content assets. Now, they just use AI to automate the vending machine.
How companies use generative #AI shows how they view #content – like a vending machine or a strategic business approach, says @Robert_Rose via @CMIContent. Share on XAI can’t improve ideas if you don’t shape them first
Today’s generative AI tools can’t proactively suggest how the business should express itself. These tools dutifully comply with the prompt’s request – whether the idea is good, bad, or indifferent.
That can work for businesses that operate content in a self-centered way. In these scenarios, teams – sales, demand generation, C-suite, PR/comms, etc. – request (or create) the content they need without understanding the greater marketing and content strategy.
These content teams go right into editing words and formatting the requested asset – functioning like a vending machine. They are the human equivalent of ChatGPT, simply responding to prompts from the rest of the business, whether the request is good, bad, or indifferent. In this scenario, the argument for replacing humans with generative AI is strong.
Content creators who go right into the mode of editing words and formatting requested assets are the human equivalent of ChatGPT, says @Robert_Rose via @CMIContent. Share on XBut a great human content team can push on ideas. They act strategically. Should you write about that? Can you build an SEO cluster around that content? Is that a gap in the thought leadership landscape? Is that thought differentiated? Is the idea even a good one? Are you sure you’re right about that industry-changing idea?
If the business takes a strategic approach to content – planning, prioritizing, and making fully visible what the business will and wants to say – then the argument for generative AI as an augmentation of talent is stronger.
AI’s most uninteresting and interesting values
Creating “original” content is the least interesting thing generative AI does. More interestingly, it can analyze, find patterns, provide insight, and help logically guide the ideation process to serve the business well. Pointing generative AI tools to a learning model and asking for clarity, ideas, and iterations – dare I say to “chat” about your content – can be a powerful trigger for more compelling ideas.
Chatting with a generative #AI tool about patterns and insight can improve the #content ideation process, says @Robert_Rose via @CMIContent. Share on XBut the key is that humans push the ideas on AI, not the other way around. Businesses see the content creator’s value in pushing ideas, not just executing the words. Great content creators stretch ideas, recognize them, and ensure they are meaningful before moving them to a planned and prioritized state where someone can manage their creation.
Smart content marketers don’t need generative AI to fulfill content requests automatically. You need a process that involves AI tools for making deliberate choices about what content your business should create.
Differentiating your brand isn’t about writing the most intelligent white paper or having the most entertaining blog. Differentiation comes from having the awareness and a repeatable process to direct the business’ great ideas into the most meaningful communication and experiences.
Differentiation comes from your business’s ability to push ideas, not words.
It’s your story. Tell it well.
HANDPICKED RELATED CONTENT:
- AI Can’t Imagine Distinctive Content (But It Can Help You Create It) [Rose-Colored Glasses
- How To Use AI-Generated Content the Right Way (and Avoid the Downsides)
- How To Combine Machine and Human Input for More Effective Content in 2023
- AI Content Detection Tools Exist – But Do You Need Them (and Can You Trust Them)?
Cover image by Joseph Kalinowski/Content Marketing Institute