By Jonathan Crossfield published November 15, 2015

When Followers Attack: A Monty Python Guide to Maintaining Social Media Harmony

social-media-harmony-cco-cover

The day starts like any other – a bit of trivial hashtag banter, a share of a new infographic, and answers to customer queries. But then an unexpected and highly negative comment kicks you right in the sentiments. Followed by another. And another.

You try to take the complaints offline. “DM me your email,” you tweet. “Call our support line,” you post on Facebook. But the attacks, complaints, and heckles keep on coming.

Eventually, someone adds a witty hashtag and that’s when your day really starts.

A social media attack can be quite a surreal experience, leaving you as bewildered and frustrated as a character in a Monty Python sketch. The trick to finding the right punchline is to know which Python sketch you are in.

“Is this the right room for an argument?” 

Palin:
Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of any statement the other person makes.

Cleese:
No it isn’t!

(The Argument Clinic – 1972)

Let’s deal with trolls first, as they’re often misunderstood.

A troll isn’t just anyone who criticizes or unleashes anger at your brand on social media. The Oxford English Dictionary defines “troll” as: “A person who makes a deliberately offensive or provocative online post,” intended to cause distress, disruption or elicit an angry response.

You can’t reason with trolls because their goal isn’t to solve a problem, discuss an issue, or provide feedback. Trolling is about deception – trying to keep you on the hook for as long as possible by convincing you that the complaints or claims are genuine. The argument is the goal and your frustration is the reward. No matter what you say or do, the troll will contradict, confound, and contest all attempts to calm or resolve the situation.

That’s why the best advice is always: “Don’t feed the trolls.” If it becomes clear that someone is only interested in ruining your day, politely call an end to the conversation. Once a troll realizes you can’t be baited further into responding, he or she will lose interest.

However, while you should ignore a troll, you shouldn’t ignore any other social media heckler. It might be tempting to treat them as trolls, as it allows you to ignore a difficult situation or dismiss their criticisms, but you may inadvertently trigger a much bigger situation.

“I wish to register a complaint!”

Cleese:
I wish to complain about this parrot what I purchased not half an hour ago from this very boutique.

Palin:
Oh yes, the Norwegian Blue. What’s wrong with it?

Cleese:
I’ll tell you what’s wrong with it. It’s dead, that’s what’s wrong with it!

Palin:
No, no, it’s resting.

Cleese:
Look, my lad, I know a dead parrot when I see one and I’m looking at one right now.

(The Dead Parrot Sketch – 1969)

Think about when someone has made you angry. If that someone refused to acknowledge your concerns or offered feeble excuses, you probably became even angrier and more determined to be taken seriously.

This is the difference between a troll and a genuine complaint. The anger is genuine and, if ignored, may come back in a very public manner. And if that single spurned complainant finds other equally unsatisfied customers online, you may find yourself facing the online equivalent of flaming torches and pitchforks.

Some social media backlashes are now so infamous that they have become the marketing equivalent of campfire horror stories. “And so the passenger took vengeance for his broken guitar by writing a catchy protest song and YouTube video that went viral, putting the social media thumbscrews on United Airlines for weeks!”

Just like United Breaks Guitars, there are many other examples of brands fueling a social media storm by refusing to treat a complaint with enough respect or by constantly dodging accountability … but I can’t advise you how to handle such a social media backlash, as social media usually isn’t the problem.

In each case, the real problem was elsewhere in the business. Someone at United broke Dave Carroll’s guitar and someone else dismissed the angry complaint. By treating the resulting firestorm as an exclusively social media problem, the brand once more trivialized and dismissed the core complaint or community concern.

If your brand chooses to blame social media for causing the problem instead of identifying what really needs fixing, then, to be blunt, you deserve everything you get.

But not every customer backlash is justified. Sometimes, a brand can be victimized by a fanatical protest it could never have expected.

“Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!”

Cardinal Fang:
You are hereby charged that you did on diverse dates commit heresy against the Holy Church.

Cardinal Biggles:
Now, how do you plead?

Lady Mountback:
We’re innocent.

Cardinal Biggles:
We’ll soon change your mind about that!

(The Spanish Inquisition sketch – 1970)

Unlike trolls, fanatics definitely want your brand to do something and won’t stop protesting or heckling until you do. But unlike a broken guitar or dead parrot, the dispute may be unfair, unrealistic, or just plain wrong.

So how do you handle the constant disruption and attacks from a fanatical inquisition that considers your brand guilty until proven innocent (and probably not even then)?

In Australia, Vegemite was one of a number of brands to come under sustained attack in social media by the Boycott Halal movement, protesting against the certification of foods as halal (i.e., permissible for Muslims to eat). Vegemite is an iconic Aussie brand that, just because of the nature of the food product, happens to be halal and therefore eligible for certification. (It’s also certified as kosher too, but that doesn’t seem to bother anyone.)

The halal critics certainly believe in their cause, but that doesn’t mean they are right. (Here’s a neat summary of the controversy.)

To reclaim its social media channels from the angry mob, Vegemite decided to get in front of the controversy with a media release and a carefully worded post on its Facebook page.

vegemite-facebook

While we enjoy a bit of banter as much as the next breakfast spread, anyone who insists on posting comments of hate, religious vilification, or unwarranted grumpiness will be removed from our social media pages. So, no matter how you spread your Vegemite, remember – we’re just here to #SpreadTheLove.

The Vegemite team used the ensuing comment thread to reply to relevant comments with the brand’s side of the story, while providing the facts about halal certification in a calm and conciliatory manner. This tactic also contained the argument to a single thread and hashtag, instead of allowing the debate to dominate the brand’s Facebook page and other social media channels.

The carefully moderated environment encouraged more of the community to speak out in defense of the brand, spreading the message across Facebook and tilting the weight of the conversation away from the protesters.

There’s nothing funny about a social media attack

Defending a brand against a social media attack isn’t easy. Knowing when to bend and when to stand firm (and when to walk away) takes experience.

It’s a good idea to have a plan in place to deal with a sudden social media crisis – when to escalate, who should be notified, and how to move the conversation out of the public arena where you can. But it’s virtually impossible to come up with a script or series of responses specific enough to get you out of trouble in all situations. Some attacks – such as the Boycott Halal campaign – just can’t be predicted and certainly can’t be resolved with generic responses.

So, don’t treat all attacks the same way. Determine what you’re dealing with, follow your agreed process, and develop the most appropriate response for the specific situation.

That’s why some days can be tough. It ain’t all memes and hashtags. Then again, I never planned to work in social media, you know. I wanted to be … a lumberjack!

This article originally appeared in the October issue of Chief Content Officer. Sign up to receive your free subscription to CMI’s bimonthly, print magazine.

Cover image by Joseph Kalinowski/Content Marketing Institute

Author: Jonathan Crossfield

If it involves putting words in a row with the occasional punctuation, then Jonathan has most likely given it a bash; from copy writing to screenwriting, blogging to journalism. He has won awards for his articles on digital marketing and his over-opinionated blog, Atomik Soapbox. Follow Jonathan on Twitter @Kimota.

Other posts by Jonathan Crossfield

Join Over 150,000 of your Peers!

Get daily articles and news delivered to your email inbox and get CMI’s exclusive e-book Launch Your Own Content Marketing Program FREE!

  • http://www.bigskywords.com/ Greg Strandberg

    Good ideas. There’s no rule that says you have to respond to a comment. Of course, that can cause problems. I totally agree that nearly always, it’s a problem with that company’s business policies and procedures that cause the dilemma. Slow and sclerotic organizations usually need look no further than within to see where the issues arose. The number of extensions on your company phone is a good indication of the number of “attacks” you’ll experience.

  • janine

    Very clever framework for the article – thanks for the reminders of Python!!

    • http://www.jonathancrossfield.com Kimota

      After John Cleese was the special guest at this year’s CMWorld (sadly without me in the audience) I just had to find a way to work Python into the column.

      I had a couple of fun-filled afternoons revisiting the classic sketches as *cough* “research”. It’s really hard trying to convince the wife that I;m working when I’m laughing at old comedy sketches on YouTube. But the moment I realised the parallels would work was an exciting one indeed.

      Glad you enjoyed it. Now I’ve reminded you, go and re-watch the sketches. (Just tell anyone who asks that it’s work-related)

  • Kellie Shepherd Moeller

    Great article…I was trolled this week and rather than answering, replied with this pic…over 100 likes

  • Jen McGahan

    I think of social media sites as my (rented, somewhat) place of business. If anyone comes in ranting, or being abusive or offensive in any way, to myself or others, I would have no problem blocking them and going about my merry way. Ugliness is never acceptable. A genuine complaint, OK, I’ll get on that quickly. But no public nuisance should be allowed.