By Howard Rauch published March 15, 2015

How Well Do You Fact-Check Your Content?


Maintaining a constant flow of highly engaging copy leads many content marketers’ to-do lists. Supervising brand journalists or content creators probably is close behind. How can you accomplish everything and ensure your brand is publishing accurate content?

Research from the American Society of Business Publication Editors Ethics Committee offers some lessons for content marketers whether you publish original, curated, or aggregated content.

Take a facts-management approach

For many content marketers, fact-checking has been a do-it-yourself affair. Staffers do their own verification because hiring full-time fact-checkers is not possible in most budgets. But the array of misinformation has exploded online. Plus, growing demand for content now means more frequent deadlines. And mounting workloads have increased reliance on outsourced material to fill content demands. All those challenges create the perfect opportunity for accuracy to take a hit.

At ASBPE, we devoted January’s Ethics News Updates to a diverse lineup of fact-checking solutions. Our research revealed an absence of formal fact-checking policies in B2B circles. As a result, we have opted to provide a B2B Facts Management Guide. It will address how to identify important facts an assignment should include, fact-checking procedures, and miscellaneous management considerations.

Let’s take a glimpse at three red flags that should be addressed in any facts-management program:

1. Verify research.

Instructive in this respect – and many others – is the sourcing section of BuzzFeed’s Editorial Standards and Ethics Guide. Here is an excerpt from its recommendation for verifying polls and other studies:

When considering reporting on a study or poll, ask these questions:

  • Have the authors included a detailed methodology?
  • How many people did they study? (For most studies, be skeptical of anything below 100; for polls, anything below 1,000.)
  • Do the authors have any conflicts of interest?
  • For medical studies: Was the study performed on humans or other animals? (Drugs, for example, that work in mice might fail in humans.)
  • For polls: How, precisely, were the questions worded?
  • Never take information directly from a press release. Instead, ask the authors for a copy of the actual study or poll.

2. Use accuracy checklists.

Two media accuracy authorities, Poynter’s Regret the Error’s Craig Silverman and Louisiana State University scholar Steve Buttry, strongly recommend the creation of written guidelines for fact-gathering situations.

Recently, I asked two dozen freelance writers serving B2B clients if they used a checklist. Only one responded in the affirmative. All brands can benefit from Silverman and Buttry’s accuracy-checklist approach.


3. Confirm the validity of claims.

In my days as vice president/editorial director of a B2B multi-publisher, I took a rigid position on content claiming alleged competitive superiority. Editors could either confirm the claim with the source or delete the claim if source verification proved too hazardous. The risk in question could materialize if an accuracy check led to rejection of information provided by a resentful source. Editors also were instructed to delete endorsement language suggesting that the publication staff was partial to the source. Examples of endorsement violation would be not editing out adjectives such as “excellent,” “efficient,” “very useful,” or other such wording appearing in the source document. If the information is inaccurate in any way, offended parties often will assume the content publisher was aware of the inaccuracy but took no steps to correct it.

Additional sources

In the absence of formal guidelines, inaction is the likely course. So as you formalize and tailor your brand’s own fact-checking program, here are some additional resources:

  • PR Newswire for Journalists – Faster Fact Checking: This four-part series provides information on sorting through statistics and other data, making sense of social media, working with crisis and public safety reporting tools, and understanding verification best practices.
  • Verification Junkie: My personal favorite lives up to its description of being “a growing directory of tools for verifying, fact-checking, and assessing the validity of social media and user-generated content.”

Stay engaged with the latest content marketing news and insights. Connect today with the Content Marketing Institute and sign up for daily and/or weekly highlights of the CMI blog and exclusive content from CMI Founder Joe Pulizzi.

Cover image by SplitShire via

Author: Howard Rauch

Howard Rauch is ethics committee chairman of the American Society of Business Publication Editors and a past recipient of the group's Lifetime Achievement Award. He also is president of Editorial Solutions, Inc., a B2B consulting firm established in 1989. In the latter capacity, he has judged several editorial excellence competitions including those sponsored by ASBPE, ABM as well as several B2B publishers. You can follow him on Twitter @editsol, connect with him on LinkedIn, or contact him directly via email.

Other posts by Howard Rauch

Join Over 150,000 of your Peers!

Get daily articles and news delivered to your email inbox and get CMI’s exclusive e-book Launch Your Own Content Marketing Program FREE!

  • Guest

    Siedn . I just agree… Sandra `s stori is unbelievable… on thursday I got themselves a McLaren F1 sincee geting a check for $7660 this-last/month and-a little over, 10/k lass-month . with-out any doubt it’s the nicest work I’ve ever had . I actually started five months/ago and almost straight away began to bring in more than $80, per/hr . see here now >>>AMAZING SITE HERE<<<

  • Bertha Floris

    Well i do the routine monthly check of content on my website i am pretty much satisfied with my content writer. besides excellent article.